WONDERFUL LINKS contact info home page
Home Page
AP English Language and Composition/ENG 121
» AP English Language and Composition Syllabus
» General Handouts for AP/ENG 121
» Peer and/or Proofreading Inquiry
» Standard Rubric for AP Compositions
» Specific Assessment Rubric
» The Rhetorical Triangle
» Figures of Speech: Schemes and Tropes
» Self Evaluation Questions
» Sentence Types and Verbals
» Summer Reading Assignments
» Rubrics
» Personal Narrative Essay
» Argument: Logical Fallacies & Propaganda
» How to Say Nothing in 500 Words
» Stevenson's Cat Bill Veto
» The Dam Letters
» Clinton Speeches
» Lincoln's First Inaugural
» Mid-term Current Issue Project
» Election Reflection Essay
» Faulkner and Morrison Speeches
» Julius Caesar
» Columnist/ Rhetorical Precis Assignment
» A Modest Proposal
» Multiple-Choice Practice Exercises
» The Synthesis Prompt
» Self-Reliance
» First Semester Final Project
» Women’s Brains by Stephen Jay Gould
» Satire Creation Assignment
» The Research Paper
» 'Is Business Bluffing Ethical?'
» In Plato's Cave by Susan Sontag
» Review and Prepare for Exam
» Collaborative Teaching Project
» Vocabulary List
English 10 Honors: American Literature
English 12/LIT 115
AP English Language and Composition/ENG 121 » General Handouts for AP/ENG 121 » Standard Rubric for AP Compositions


Standard Rubric for AP Compositions Standard Rubric for AP Compositions

 

AP English Language & Composition Standard Rubric

 

8-9 (95-105)  These are well-organized and well-written essays. With apt and specific references to the passage, they will analyze the prompt in depth and with appropriate support.  While not without flaws, these papers demonstrate an understanding of the text and a consistent control over the elements of effective composition. These writers read with perception and express their ideas with clarity, skill and maturity.  Because a 9 is exceptional, it earns 5 points extra credit.

 

6-7 (80-85) They are less incisive, developed, or aptly supported than papers in the highest ranges. They deal accurately with the prompt, but they are less effective or thorough than the 8-9 essays. These essays demonstrate the writer's ability to express ideas clearly but with less maturity and control than the better papers. Generally, essays scored a 7 present a more developed analysis and a more consistent command of the elements of effective exposition than essays scored a 6.

 

5 (75) Customarily, these essays are superficial and unfocused.  The writing is adequate to convey the writer's thoughts, but these essays are typically ordinary, not as well conceived, organized or developed as upper-level papers. Often, they reveal simplistic thinking and/or immature writing.

 

3-4  (50-60) These lower-half essays may reflect an incomplete understanding of the passage and fail to respond adequately to part or parts of the prompt. The discussion may be inaccurate or unclear, and misguided or undeveloped; these essays may paraphrase or summarize rather than analyze. The treatment is likely to be meager and unconvincing. Generally, the writing demonstrates weak control of such elements as diction, organization, syntax, or grammar. These essays typically contain recurrent stylistic flaws and lack persuasive evidence from the text. Any essay that does not address the prompt can receive no higher than a 4.

 

1-2  (30-40) These essays compound the weaknesses of the papers in the 3-4 range. They seriously misread the passage or fail to respond to the question. Frequently, they are unacceptably brief. Often poorly written on several counts, these essays may contain many distracting errors in grammar and mechanics. Although some attempt may have been made to answer the question, the writer's views typically are presented with little clarity, organization, coherence, or supporting evidence.

 





Mr. Gunnar's English Classes
Jefferson County
Conifer High School
10441 County Hwy 73
Conifer, CO 80433


SchoolWorld an Edline Solution
Teacher Websites © 2014 Edline